Non-monotonic Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence
نویسنده
چکیده
In this article we introduce a non-monotonic reasoning engine, i.e., the assumption-based truth maintenance system, and two reasoning paradigms for solving the diagnosis problem that are based on this engine. The objective of the article is to present solutions for problems occurring in classical expert systems based on first-order or propositional logic. In particular, we show how to handle inconsistencies of theories by introducing assumptions or hypothesis. As a consequence, some sort of common sense and default reasoning can be solved. The idea is to allow inference only if the inferred results are not leading to a contradiction.
منابع مشابه
Complexity of Non-Monotonic Logics
Over the past few decades, non-monotonic reasoning has developed to be one of the most important topics in computational logic and artificial intelligence. The non-monotonicity here refers to the fact that, while in usual (monotonic) reasoning adding more axioms leads to potentially more possible conclusions, in non-monotonic reasoning adding new facts to a knowledge base may prevent previously...
متن کاملNon-monotonic Inference
Non-monotonic inference is inference that is defeasible: in contrast with deductive inference, the conclusions drawn may be withdrawn in the light of further information, even though all the original premises are retained. Much of our everyday reasoning is like this, and a non-monotonic approach has applications to a number of technical problems in artificial intelligence. Work on formalizing n...
متن کاملCan Formal Non-monotonic Systems Properly Describe Human Reasoning?
Monotonic (logical) reasoning makes the strong claim that an inference cannot be contradicted by future information; an assumption contrary to everyday life experience. This assumption is relaxed in non-monotonic reasoning. However, there are only few formal non-monotonic theories of reasoning that have inspired psychological theory-building. Can formal systems such as cumulative logic (system ...
متن کاملA Taxonomy for Argumentative Frameworks based on Labelled Deduction
Artificial Intelligence has long dealt with the issue of finding a suitable formalization for reasoning with incomplete and potentially inconsistent information. Defeasible argumentation [SL92,CML00,PraVre99] has proven to be a successful approach in many respects, since it naturally resembles many aspects of commonsense reasoning (see [CML00,PraVre99] for details). Besides, recent work [PraVre...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010